<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: General comments on DLA PIPER RUDNICK GRAY CARY presentation of the material</title>
	<link>http://www.easy-mobiles.co.uk/general-comments-on-dla-piper-rudnick-gray-cary-presentation-of-the-material/</link>
	<description>Easy-Mobiles vs easyMobile and the story of this domain</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 18:03:41 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Easy Mobiles &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Oooops, I did it again, or do DLA PIPER RUDNICK GRAY CARY UK LLP ever read what they send out?</title>
		<link>http://www.easy-mobiles.co.uk/general-comments-on-dla-piper-rudnick-gray-cary-presentation-of-the-material/#comment-15</link>
		<author>Easy Mobiles &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Oooops, I did it again, or do DLA PIPER RUDNICK GRAY CARY UK LLP ever read what they send out?</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jun 2006 00:09:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.easy-mobiles.co.uk/general-comments-on-dla-piper-rudnick-gray-cary-presentation-of-the-material/#comment-15</guid>
		<description>[...] Foolishly I assumed that this very web site is my public response to their letters. Little did I know that they actually expect something with a bit of personal touch (a letter?, a phonecall may be?). These two things just once again show that in the DLA PIPER RUDNICK GRAY CARY UK LLP they not only do not read what they put in envelops, but also that they are generally not doing the rest of their job properly. Consider that I first noticed this in the first DLA PIPER RUDNICK GRAY CARY letter on the 26 of May (the letter itself went online a day earlier) and mentioned this for the second time here. In effect this means that for all this time neither the Lawyers nor their clients ever bothered to look at the domain in question! Not being myself an obsessive attention seeker, I take the lack of interest from the side of people whom I&#8217;d rather avoid anyway as a good sign but to add to this it also makes defending the job of defending easy-mobiles domain much easier. Firstly, it is yet another argument confirming bad faith on the side of the easyGroup IP Licensing Limited as it clearly demonstrates the lack of genuine interest in the domain itself but rather looks as a poor implementation of scare tactics. Secondly, I assume that if this matter will ever go to court and/or will be presented to the Nominet, this website will be assesed in all its entirety. If a big Law Firm wishes to be reputed as a laughing stock, than who am I to prevent them from doing this? Well, I honestly don&#8217;t know if Stelios somehow enjoys preferential treatment from the DLA PIPER RUDNICK GRAY CARY UK LLP and this is a part of their VIP Service or this is just their general policy, but with this degree of incompetence and negligence they are certainly not at the top of my list of Law Firms now. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Foolishly I assumed that this very web site is my public response to their letters. Little did I know that they actually expect something with a bit of personal touch (a letter?, a phonecall may be?). These two things just once again show that in the DLA PIPER RUDNICK GRAY CARY UK LLP they not only do not read what they put in envelops, but also that they are generally not doing the rest of their job properly. Consider that I first noticed this in the first DLA PIPER RUDNICK GRAY CARY letter on the 26 of May (the letter itself went online a day earlier) and mentioned this for the second time here. In effect this means that for all this time neither the Lawyers nor their clients ever bothered to look at the domain in question! Not being myself an obsessive attention seeker, I take the lack of interest from the side of people whom I&#8217;d rather avoid anyway as a good sign but to add to this it also makes defending the job of defending easy-mobiles domain much easier. Firstly, it is yet another argument confirming bad faith on the side of the easyGroup IP Licensing Limited as it clearly demonstrates the lack of genuine interest in the domain itself but rather looks as a poor implementation of scare tactics. Secondly, I assume that if this matter will ever go to court and/or will be presented to the Nominet, this website will be assesed in all its entirety. If a big Law Firm wishes to be reputed as a laughing stock, than who am I to prevent them from doing this? Well, I honestly don&#8217;t know if Stelios somehow enjoys preferential treatment from the DLA PIPER RUDNICK GRAY CARY UK LLP and this is a part of their VIP Service or this is just their general policy, but with this degree of incompetence and negligence they are certainly not at the top of my list of Law Firms now. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Easy Mobiles &#187; Blog Archive &#187; My Public Apologies to the DLA Piper Rudnick Gray Cary</title>
		<link>http://www.easy-mobiles.co.uk/general-comments-on-dla-piper-rudnick-gray-cary-presentation-of-the-material/#comment-4</link>
		<author>Easy Mobiles &#187; Blog Archive &#187; My Public Apologies to the DLA Piper Rudnick Gray Cary</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jun 2006 06:16:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.easy-mobiles.co.uk/general-comments-on-dla-piper-rudnick-gray-cary-presentation-of-the-material/#comment-4</guid>
		<description>[...] Easy Mobiles Easy-Mobiles vs easyMobile and the story of this domain      &#171; General comments on DLA PIPER RUDNICK GRAY CARY presentation of the material [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Easy Mobiles Easy-Mobiles vs easyMobile and the story of this domain      &laquo; General comments on DLA PIPER RUDNICK GRAY CARY presentation of the material [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
